Canal History- Navigational History
The southeast corner of New England, to which the name "Cape
Cod" was given by the explorer, Bartholomew Gosnold in
1602, reaches out in the form of a narrow, hooked spit to
one of the two most hazardous sections of the Atlantic Coast.
It is said that experienced mariners fear the waters to the
east and south of Cape Cod more than those off Cape Hatteras.
The hazardous region off Cape Cod, known as Nantucket Shoals,
and consisting of a bottom of shifting sand over which the
depth varies from 1 to 25 fathoms, extends about 70 miles
almost due south from the southernmost part of Cape Cod at
Monomoy Point to the navigational aid which replaced the "Nantucket
Light Ship", marking the outer limit of the area. In
traversing the Cape Cod section of the coast, waterborne traffic
had, until 1914 (when the Canal was opened to traffic), the
choice between two routes; the all-sea route outside the Nantucket
Light Ship, or the Vineyard Sound route, which entailed navigating
a zigzag course through tortuous channels in the Nantucket
Shoals area, passable only by a limited number of vessels.
The larger vessels were forced to use the route around the
Nantucket Light Ship.
Although these routes are lighted and well marked, the difficulties
attending their navigation are increased by the prevalence
in the area of dense fog caused by evaporation due to the
meeting of warm, easterly air currents and cold currents from
the Maine coast. The 300-year history of navigation in this
section reflects the natural hazardous conditions of this
area of shoals, irregular courses, currents, wind, ice and
fog and a general lack of refuge, with a long, tragic list
of wrecks and their accompanying toll of lives, cargoes, and
ships.
Colonel Edward Durr, C.E., stated in 1922, "the special
economic function of a Cape Cod Canal is to provide a route
that will be economically more desirable to traffic than the
natural routes around Cape Cod through the elimination of
dangers and delays and the expense resulting there from."
In spite of the increase in Canal traffic after its purchase
by the Government in 1928, the use of this waterway was limited
by its narrow width and shallow depth to the smaller type
of vessel. Large vessels were still forced to use the outside
route. In the 15-year period prior to 1930, 75 accidents occurred
in the Canal, causing an estimated loss of $800,000. The cause
of most of these accidents can be traced to the narrow channel
then existing, to rapid currents, or to their combined adverse
influence.
The special economic function of the Canal was not completely
fulfilled by its original construction or by its ownership
and operation by the Government. Because of the limited dimensions,
the many benefits accruing from the use of the Canal were
not available to all classes of shipping. Therefore, as a
result of numerous economic studies, physical surveys and
hydraulic investigations, improvement was undertaken with
a view to serving adequately that large and very important
part of the nation's waterborne commerce.
The Canal has what can be a confusing range of tides. Mean
tide range in Cape Cod Bay is 9.4 ft. but only 4 ft. in Buzzards
Bay. The phase and mean tide levels also differ in the two
bays. This differential produces high tide in Buzzards Bay
three hours ahead of that in Cape Cod Bay. Mean tide is five
feet higher in the latter bay. The currents reverse direction
every six hours, and a maximum current velocity of 5.2 knots
is generated. The effect of these tidal phenomena on a theoretical
Canal section of 540 feet wide and 32 feet deep has been studied
with the aid of a model 115 feet in length and constructed
at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
This model yielded valuable data which were useful in planning
the present Canal. It was built of concrete to a horizontal
scale of 1:600 and a vertical scale of 1:60. Tides were automatically
created by an electrical water-level control mechanism, and
water levels at stations along the model were obtained by
an electrical water-level indicator. Both devices gave results
to 1/100 inch in the model. In addition to the determination
of hydraulic data, the study disclosed serious eddy and crosscurrent
conditions in Buzzards Bay, which were corrected by the construction
of dikes. These dikes were constructed by the disposal of
the material dredged hydraulically from the Buzzards Bay approach
channel. Hog Island, or Buzzards Bay Channel, the straight
western approach to the Canal with a width of 500 feet and
a depth of 32 feet at mean low water, was opened to navigation
on April 22, 1937. The mooring basins at the easterly and
westerly ends of the Canal are equipped with mooring dolphins,
the depth available at the former is 25 feet, and at the latter,
32 feet, both at mean low water.
The land through which the Canal passes is composed principally
of sand, although gravel, cobbles, and boulders are present.
Much of the sand is fine and capable of being moved by tidal
currents and the surface waves caused by wind or the passage
of vessels. To preserve and protect the bank slope and alignment
of the sides of the Canal from this wave wash, revetment 2
feet thick, composed of riprap and crushed stone, and extending
5 feet below water level to 5 feet above high water, has been
placed on both banks for the whole length of the Canal. The
revetment work was done largely in the dry, prior to widening
the Canal by dredging.
The project depth of 32 feet at mean low water was selected
because it will accommodate nearly all vessels entering or
leaving the ports of Boston and Portland. The increase in
Canal traffic is reflected not only in the number of vessels
using the Canal, but also in the average size and value of
the cargo.
The traffic in the Canal reflects the commercial and industrial
activity of New England. Savings of distance, fuel and time,
more reliable ship schedules, and other incidental benefits
are available to practically all coastwise and intercoastal
shipping serving this important section of the nation's industrial
and economic life.
|